You are currently browsing the monthly archive for January 2008.
One of the most stressful parts of infertility is understanding when a pregnancy is just coming slowly and when to say, “this is a problem of infertility.” Unfortunately, the lines are very blurry and it is hard for most women to know (and to accept) that they are dealing with a true fertility challenge.
Here is a You-Tube video of Kim Hahn. Kim is the founder and CEO of Conceive Magazine, and also wrote the introduction to our book, I Am More Than My Infertility. In this video, Kim talks with the people at NewBaby.com about the diagnosis of infertility and the time line it involves.
Nix caffeine!!
That’s the latest message from a new study published by the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to this new research, pregnant women who consume as little as 200 mg of caffeine a day–the amount in 10 ounces of coffee or 25 ounces of tea–may double their risk of miscarriage.
Of course, there is some debate as to the specifics. Some doctors say just give up the caffeine for the first 3 or 4 months of pregnancy. Others say just limit your caffeine intake to one cup. But to my way of thinking, why take chance?
There’s really no down side to giving up caffeine–once you get through the headaches or tiredness that happens initially for some people. But even this can be minimized by just decreasing your caffeine intake gradually.
For additional information on diet and fertility, go to our book, I Am More Than My Infertility – 7 Proven Tools for Turning a Life Crisis into a Personal Breakthrough. Right now our book is on a special price on our website www.IAmMore.net.
Marina
The other day, I was flipping through the Orlando Sentinel, and came across the article, “What If A Spouse is a Twin?” (www.Orlandosentinel.com; January 12, 2008). The incident reported took place in London, where twins, who were separated at birth, got married, without realizing they were brother and sister. Lord David Alton, a British lawmaker, is urging more information be provided on birth certificates for adopted children.
The first thing I thought about when I read the article was how many couples I’ve worked with who have voiced the same concern about fertility procedures. For example, a sperm donor may have donated many times, and as a result, have fathered a number of children. If the genetic father, or even the fact that donor sperm was used, is not identified, who’s to say what the source of attraction is between two people?
Lord Alton favors an amendment to the Human Fertilization and Embryology Bill that would require birth certificates of children born from donated sperm to say so, and to identify the father genetic. To my way ot thinking, this is a good idea, and it’s time that the law caught up with reproductive technology. Any thoughts?
Marina
